• 4 New Hampshire Legislators
    • How well do You really know Jordan Ulery?
  • About NHRedress
    • Authority to Claim Redress
    • Contact Your New Hampshire Legislators
    • Graphics
  • Events
    • 2014 Classes on 200 years of the New Hampshire Redress Process
  • NH Legislative Journals
  • People’s Orders To Vacate, Cease & Desist
  • Petitions
    • BAN MANDATORY VACCINATION
    • Ban Water Fluoridation
    • F.E. Everett Turnpike
    • GMO Labeling
    • Granite State Future
    • Jury Nullification Classes
    • Legal Tender Issue
    • License Plate Readers
    • Mandate Jury Nulification Classes
    • Nullify ObamaCare
    • Repeal Common Core
    • Stand Your Ground
    • Wrongful Foreclosures
  • Source Documents
  • The Constituency Bills Process
    • The Constituency Bills Process
  • The Original 13th Amendment
    • Bioren & Duane
    • Indiana
    • Kansas & Virginia
    • Massachusetts
    • Missouri & Iowa
    • New Hampshire
      • Nov. 20, 2012 – Notice and Demand
      • The People on New Hampshire
    • Ohio 1824 & 1831
    • Page Links to Books with the Missing/Original 13th Amendment
    • Rhode Island

New Hampshire Redress: Part 1, Article 31

~ "The legislature shall assemble for the redress of public grievances and for making such laws as the public good may require"

New Hampshire Redress: Part 1, Article 31

Category Archives: Uncategorized

Apportionment of the U.S. House – Elected Representative Plaintiffs Needed for Washington D.C. US District Court Case# 1:17-cv-00793

02 Saturday Dec 2017

Posted by greyursk in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

3 Judge Panel, Apportionment, Representation, Washington D.C. Lawsuit

Apportionment of the U.S. House – Elected Representative Plaintiffs Needed for Washington D.C. US District Court Case# 1:17-cv-00793

We seek Elected Representative plaintiffs* to hold a conference call with the attorneys involved in the case. Contact us (details below) if you have interest in knowing more.

Summary

  • This is an ongoing Lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in District of Columbia.
  • The Original Amendment, if properly ratified, holds that each U.S. House member should represent no more than 50,000 people (view below).
  • The effect would be to increase the size of the U.S. House and give the common citizens of America reasonable access to their congressional representatives.
  • A 3 Judge Trial Court has been formed to consider whether Article I of the Bill of Rights dealing with the apportionment of the U.S. House was properly passed. This type of case is deemed so important it requires 3 judges and any appeal goes straight to the U.S. Supreme Court.

At this time, each U.S. House member on average has between about 725,000 and 750,000 people each and in lieu of adding representatives as the population grows, each representative merely adds more staff members. We as citizens have less and less access to our representatives.

————————————–

Details

The Constitution for the United States of America was written in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and was then sent to the 13 Several States for ratification.

The so called “Federalists” were pushing the quick ratification of the Constitution.

The so called “Anti-Federalists” were upset with the proposed U.S. Constitution and felt that it gave the central government too much power. The Anti-Federalists also argued the Constitution needed a “Bill of Rights”.

Some States passed the U.S. Constitution, but others balked and it appears in order to stop the Constitution from being derailed, members of the convention drafted a Bill of Rights out of the hundreds of ideas from people of the founding time.

Congress grouped these ideas into 12 Amendments labeled as Articles.

These were then sent to the States for ratification.

It appears that all but the first two Articles were ratified by the 13 States. The other 10 Amendments went on to become the U.S. Bill of Rights.

Article the second was later ratified in 1994 as the 27th Amendment.

Article the first, claimed not ratified, was designed to make it so that no member of the U.S. House of Representatives would have more than 50,000 people in their districts.

This supposedly un-ratified Article reads:

Article the first . . . After the first enumeration required by the first article of the Constitution, there shall be one Representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred Representatives, nor less than one Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of Representatives shall amount to two hundred; after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one Representative for every fifty thousand persons.

Plaintiff LaVergne, both a Lawyer and Constitutional Scholar, believes the official historical record wrongly shows that the Amendment was never ratified. He has collected up all the records from the original 13 states and says it was in fact ratified. He has brought this case forward to correct this major oversight. He and 3 other plaintiffs are currently arguing this case before a 3 Judge panel.

LaVergne seeks State Legislators from these Original 13 States (and others) to take a position with him; to take a stands on this and push for this article to be enacted.

We have attorneys who can represent all plaintiffs willing to join. This is the most important issue that must be dealt with now is that Our future as Americans and our Liberties are tied to this very issue.

If representation is not increased, the Courts and the Executive Branch will expand their power until there is no liberty left!

Please Contact “Upstanding Person” at upstanding.person@gmail.com or contact me (Gus Breton) via email at greyursk@gmail.com . . . feel free to call or text if you already have my cell #

*  Others (common man) may also join the suit in the future to seek relief from the lack of effective representation they currently have in D.C. as State Citizens. 

If you wish to help,

please forward this page to your State Legislators

and post a link to this page on your social media

———————————

 

Elected Representative Plaintiffs sought for current Article I, Bill of Rights apportionment Lawsuit in Washington DC

17 Friday Nov 2017

Posted by greyursk in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

We as “Citizens” have less and less access to “Our” representatives

Each US House member currently represents about 735,000 people, and in lieu of adding representatives as the population grows, each representative merely adds more staff members.

This is ONLY a Draft Page at this time

Check back in a couple days for additional emails and proper links to more info

Congress-border-1.png

Elected State Representative Plaintiffs are sought for a current Article I Bill of Rights apportionment Lawsuit filed in US District Court in Washington DC.

Representatives from all States are needed to strengthen the case, and those from the original 13 States are Highly sought at this time

A conference call with the attorneys involved in the case will be held for any State Representatives that are interested in more information

A 3 Judge Trial Court has been formed to consider whether the original Article I (of 12) of the Bill of Rights dealing with the apportionment of the US House was properly passed.

The Amendment if properly ratified 200+ years ago would hold that each US House member should represent no more than 50,000 people.

The effect would be to increase the size of the US House and give the common citizens of America access to their representatives.

The folks (attorney’s & others) working on this case would like to get at least a half dozen Elected Representative Plaintiffs from each of the several States.

If you’re a current State Representative seeking more information,

Please Contact Upstanding Person at upstanding.person@gmail.com 

If you wish to help,

please forward this page to your State Representatives

and post a link to this page on your social media

———————————

Please forward this page to any one else that may share an interest in this issue. Click HERE to learn more about why you may wish to add yourself as a claimant in this case.

Thank you

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • December 2017
  • November 2017

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

hello

Blog Stats

  • 17,513 hits

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy